Avallonn
View Our Ratings
Structure in the vast unkown
Developed to bring financial-grade discipline to legal assets,
the Avallonn Signature Ratings Scale evaluates litigation claims across
multiple dimensions of risk, structure, and systemic significance.
The Avallonn Signature Ratings Scale
The Scale
The Avallonn Ratings Scale reflects a unique approach to valuing legal assets.
Each rating includes a stylized grade and a public-facing name—combining the familiarity of capital markets with a distinct identity rooted in litigation analysis.
AaA
A•Prime
Exceptional legal, financial, and procedural strength. Ideal for flagship investors.
BbB
B•Viable
Sound legal and financial foundation. Some exposure
to volatility or timing friction.
CcC
C•Unstable
Legal posture or fundability is weak. Structural volatility across dimensions.
D
D•Disruptive
Potential to reshape precedent, regulation, or industry behavior. Value is non-monetary.
aA
A•Superior
Structurally strong with minimal friction. Strategic strength and stability.
bB
B•Exposed
Viable case with gaps in
narrative alignment or procedural positioning.
cC
C•Fractured
Procedurally blocked, poorly aligned, or market-adverse. Rarely investable.
On Our Radar
Here are the cases we're currently watching—lawsuits we’re actively grading and monitoring for their significance, complexity, social significance, and potential to shape the legal landscape. Each case has been selected for its relevance, scale, or unique legal questions, offering a curated view of the most noteworthy developments in litigation today. Our ongoing analysis keeps investors informed about the cases that matter most.
Jeffrey Wright v. SLWM, LLC
bB
B•Exposed
Funder Entanglement in Employment Disputes
A former exec’s noncompete challenge has widened into a broader legal strike against litigation funders.
Gallant Capital Partners now faces direct exposure, raising precedent-setting questions about investor control in workforce exits.
Funder Entanglement in Employment Disputes
Therium & Legalist
v.
De Leon & Abudawood
BbB
A Win—Then A Vanishing Act.
B•Viable
Funders won an $18.47M arbitration after heirs to a $1.92B estate refused to finalize a settlement.
Despite strong merits, offshore enforcement risk clouds recovery. A legal victory—now burdened by a disappearance act.
Haptic, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
AaA
A•Prime
Control the Patent,
Control the Market
This case spotlights a growing trend: funded patent suits targeting entrenched tech giants.
Haptic’s claim zeroes in on Apple’s “Back Tap” iPhone feature, alleging infringement of its own flagship tech, “Knocki.”
Avallonn ratings are independent and proprietary. They are not investment advice.
Grading access is subject to usage agreement.